DD-Atelier is Closing and I am in MOURNING.

dd-atelier-closing

I wish I could go back in time and buy a black dress from DD-Atelier.

I have never mourned the passing of a clothing company before, but no other company has meant as much to me as this one has.

Understand that I love most of the companies I have mentioned in the short time I’ve been blogging.

Biubiu introduced me to the busty clothing world. Urkye fits me like a dream. Pinup Girl Clothing made my wedding magical. Naoko is a dream come true.

But DD-Atelier! DD-Atelier changed my life.

When I first discovered this company, the value of the Euro had more-or-less priced me out of ever purchasing anything. This changed around the summer of 2015, when I ordered my first item.

 

dd-atelier-tie-dye-dress

 

 

And . . . it didn’t fit. I couldn’t zip it past my flared ribcage, and as I’d foolishly convinced myself that I could somehow cardio my way into losing a few inches of bone, I never returned the item.

It’s still hanging in my closet, tags attached, waiting for someone with a non-flared ribcage to purchase it.

So why did I order again? Because this piece was so creatively structured around the bust. Often, companies rely on princess seams or darts to accommodate a larger bust.

DD-Atelier took a different approach.

Each piece accommodates the bust in a uniquely flattering manner. Some, like the first item I purchased, utilized additional panels to create an architecturally perfect enclosure for larger busts.

And hey, some of them used princess lines as well — but with a precision that was downright artistic.

dd-atelier-ornella-dress.jpg

More importantly, DD-Atelier was the rare busty line that offered so much more than cotton jersey basics and vintage-inspired numbers. They released basics, yes, but they also provided busty ladies with officewear, sundresses, winter coats, rain jackets, pajamas, evening gowns, cocktail attire, and more.

 

dd-atelier-white_cayenne_jacket

I cannot tell you how much I wish I’d purchased their suffragette suit when it was still in stock.

 

Certainly, the flawless construction of their clothing made me feel like every time I wore DD-Atelier was a special occasion, even if it was anything but. I’ve worn their clothing in job interviews, to meet with my wedding planner, and even on hikes.

 

dd-atelier-diva-dress

The Diva Dress. For divas, by divas.

 

While DD-Atelier had a “signature” collection that included classics like the Diva Dress and the Cayenne skirt set, I will always regard their team as innovators above all else.

 

dd-atelier_cayenne

The Cayenne is equal parts “flattering” and “professional.”

And here’s the saddest part: If the busty clothing world were larger, more profitable, and, let’s face it, less moral, DD-Atelier would have revolutionized the entire industry. Every other company would be copying their styles.

Substandard, mimeograph-quality pieces would be popping up in fast-fashion stores around the world.

Understand, I wouldn’t want that to happen. But I do wish that the small, creative, internationally successful companies that form the backbone of the busty clothing community would receive the accolades and recognition that they deserve.

These are companies that have never participated in Fashion Week. They don’t have name recognition in the wider fashion community.

 

But they make their customers happy. DD-Atelier made me feel beautiful every time I opened my closet.

So I want to honor their contributions to the bust community. I’ll devote a few posts here to the pieces I’ve purchased over the years, with the hope that other busty companies survive, and continue the tradition of creativity and innovation that DD-Atelier embodied.

Introducing Kit: A Bespoke Clothing Company Coming Soon to a Cocktail Party Near You

Kit_dress_page_coupon

Kit: A uniform soldiers wear into battle. Sounds about right!

I am always on the lookout for new busty or bust-friendly companies based in the United States.

This is mostly to save on shipping expenses, particularly for returns. But more than that, I want domestic busty clothing companies to be so successful that investors start to recognize the demand for these products is very real, and very profitable.

In other words, it would be awesome if investors paid more people to design clothing for us.

And by “us,” I mean “me.”

Which is why I was delighted to see that The Houston Chronicle has profiled Merin Guthrie, founder of a new, body-friendly clothing line named Kit.

Guthrie crowdfunded to start this company, and has achieved quite the following thus far. Kit primarily offers classic silhouettes — office-appropriate investment pieces that will last forever and work for a number of occasions. This includes a standard black wrap dress.

kit_wrap_dress

A classic black wrap dress that actually fits? Do those exist?

As a busty lady, I’ve been told repeatedly that wrap dresses are flattering and that they totally hold their shape and flatter the décolletage.

In my experience, however, wrap dresses exist solely to let the curious public know what color my bra is.

I certainly hope Kit can prove me wrong. Because PRETTY.

Kit doesn’t serve the busty community exclusively. Instead, it asks users to create “Size You.”

This is a personalized size based on user-based input, like body shape, height, weight, bra size, and measurements.

kit_body_shape_guide

So this company could potentially be an EXTRA-win. It may be the rare company that offers a Perfect Fit rather than a Good Enough fit.

They recently redesigned their website, making it more responsive and streamlined.  You can also learn more about the KIT team, which is especially refreshing. While busty shoppers are often familiar with company founders, I really haven’t seen anything this personalized on any of the other clothing websites I frequent.

Speaking of personalized, Kit is hosting a pop-up shops this week!

And by hosting, I mean HOSTING.

Their pop-ups include cocktail parties. Two great tastes, one great event.

Actually, make that TWO great events.

If you’re in New York City on Thursday, be sure to visit the Village between 6 and 8 p.m.

If you can’t do weekdays, you can also meet the KIT team in Greenwich, CT between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m.

Be sure to R.S.V.P. if you decide to go. I may visit one or the other, so you just might see me there.

And check back for an interview with Natalie Christopher, their Customer Experience Director.

 

Same Print, Different Day: Would You Try the Polish Porcelain Trend?

urkye photo porcelain

Button-down out on the town.

So maybe my foray into porcelain-inspired fabric wasn’t a once-in-a-lifetime chance for me to meet my #bustygirlgoals. It looks like Polish clothing companies are making a concentrated effort to make fine china prints A Thing.

Previously, I highlighted one of Urkye’s porcelain tops in an article that focused on the values of busty clothing companies. The one pictured above utilizes the same pattern. Urkye showcases its clothing on different body types so consumers know what to expect.

I’ve been eyeing this shirt for months, but since I miraculously own not one but four button-down tops that fit me properly, I have yet to pull the trigger on this one.

But I thought of it immediately when I recognized the pattern here:

zulily photo porcelain

Finally, a porcelain-print blazer, for all your porcelain-print blazer needs.

Yes, that is the exact same print, in blazer form, by the Polish brand Peperuna.

I’ve been eyeing Peperuna on Zulily for a while. As I mentioned yesterday, they have a similar aesthetic to Naoko. They focus on office wear, but they also have a few unconventional items like hot pink jumpsuits just to keep it interesting.

Their sizing chart looks bust-friendly, though I’m waiting for Zulily to reimburse me before I verify this for myself.

I haven’t found this particular print anywhere else, but I think it’s safe to say that if two companies are using it, then it is officially A Thing. I will be on the lookout for more porcelain-inspired fabric, because I am an obsessive weirdo.

It is also for that reason that I noticed that while the print is identical, the fabric is not. Urkye gave this description:

urkye description porcelain

Urkye’s item copy is made out of happiness.

Zulily described the Peperuna fabric as such:

zulily description porcelain

None of those fabrics are “linen.”

Of course it’s probable that the fabric supplier uses the same print on different fabrics. A cotton-elastane blend is ideal shirting material for the busty, while a cotton-poly-elastane blend would create a casual blazer that holds its shape.

Still, I’m going to be honest.

I am skeptical of all of Zulily’s descriptions now, and will be until they send me something that fits as advertised.

I am not okay with them using the term “linen” to describe something that contains no linen. Linen is a summer-appropriate fabric made out of flax bast fibers. It is not a cotton-poly blend.

And it is beyond me why someone would want a linen blazer in the first place. Linen wrinkles very easily. A cotton-poly-elastane blend would hold its shape and be breathable, so why not just say it’s a cotton-poly-elastane blend, or leave out a fabric description entirely?

Contradictory information like that makes me distrust the description as a whole.

Given that Urkye has never misled me, their description of the fiber blend makes me all the more skeptical. Again, it would make sense to use different fabric for different garments.

I have trust issues. Redeem yourself, Zulily! Describe items accurately or not at all.

My feelings aside, this print is apparently a THING now, so accept its Thingness. I personally would prefer a blue print on a white background, but I can see why navy is a bit more practical.

I like the simplicity of rendering an intricate floral pattern in just two colors. It’s an elegant enough pattern to be appropriate in most work settings. It’s not terribly fun, but we can’t have everything in this life.

The print is All. Business.

I respect the print.

I don’t love it, and I probably won’t buy it, but I see what it is trying to accomplish and commend it for becoming A Thing.

We should all be so lucky as to become A Thing.

Do you like this print? Do you respect it? Would you wear it? Have you acknowledged the thingness of the thing? Let me know in the comments or email me!

 

 

Busty Clothing: Too “Sexy” for Facebook?

DD-Atelier posted the following today:

facebookad

Floor-length gown with barely-visible cleavage? Is she a witch?

Are you scandalized? I’m scandalized.

I mean, I take bathroom mirror selfies all the time, and it’s literally impossible for me to take a photo that doesn’t show my toilet. It’s not fair that she doesn’t have the same problem.

Still, I have to thank her for her efforts. She took this photo purely to show other women how well the dress fits. You can tell because she’s wearing normal-face, not ducklips-face.

This is, again, why I prefer  busty clothing companies — they don’t portray breasts as central to a woman’s personality or experience. They focus on a flattering fit — and if a woman chooses to look sexy in their clothes, that’s her decision.

Because nearly all DD-Atelier customers purchase their clothing online, fit is a constant concern, so the more feedback we have regarding individual items, the better-informed we are when placing an order. Obviously, they aren’t going to use a bunch of user-generated bathroom selfies on their landing pages, but providing some visibility on social media helps their customers and prospective customers make educated purchasing decisions.

Despite the intent and innocuous nature behind the photo, Facebook banned advertising because this velvet number is allegedly “too revealing.” You know, unlike the other ad campaigns that Facebook allows.

victoriasecretad

I don’t even think the models here are posed provocatively by Victoria’s Secret standards — they just look like Photoshopped friends who really, really enjoy showcasing their respective thigh-gap to the male gaze.

But to allow this ad while claiming that a selfie in a floor-length dress doesn’t cover enough skin?

Are they saying Victoria’s Secret models aren’t sexy enough to be considered desirable in bikinis?

Are they saying DD-Atelier loyalists are so sexy that the mere thought of one going shoeless in her bathroom might shake the very foundations of the internet and the hegemony it serves?

I don’t know. And since this is a niche brand in a niche market, I’ll probably never know. If any of my, like, 4 readers knows, please post in the comments.